BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CiviCRM//NONSGML CiviEvent iCal//EN
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Chicago
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20261003T090000
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:CiviCRM_EventID_65_a6423a52ba686284ea3f76b9c35e7af4@austinpsychoanalytic.org
SUMMARY:Ethical Considerations in the Clinical Use of Self
 -Disclosure
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
  "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"><html><body><p>Contemp
 orary discourse on self-disclosure frequently emph
 asizes enactment\, dismissing the possibility of f
 ormulating effective guidelines for deliberate use
 . This perspective contradicts existing literature
  and raises ethical questions about both disclosin
 g and withholding the therapist’s countertransfere
 nce. The view that it is impossible to determine w
 hat or when to disclose due to the uniqueness of e
 ach dyadic relationship positions enactment as pur
 er communication because it is unconscious and spo
 ntaneous. However\, this stance is inconsistent wi
 th both case reports and empirical research on dis
 closure. This presentation examines overlooked asp
 ects of the literature and challenges over-relianc
 e on enactment\, highlighting associated ethical d
 ilemmas. Research findings on therapist disclosure
 \, clinical examples\, and evidence-based guidelin
 es for its use will be presented.</p>\n </body></h
 tml>
DESCRIPTION:Contemporary discourse on self-disclosure frequent
 ly emphasizes enactment\, dismissing the possibili
 ty of formulating effective guidelines for deliber
 ate use. This perspective contradicts existing lit
 erature and raises ethical questions about both di
 sclosing and withholding the therapist’s countertr
 ansference. The view that it is impossible to dete
 rmine what or when to disclose due to the uniquene
 ss of each dyadic relationship positions enactment
  as purer communication because it is unconscious 
 and spontaneous. However\, this stance is inconsis
 tent with both case reports and empirical research
  on disclosure. This presentation examines overloo
 ked aspects of the literature and challenges over-
 reliance on enactment\, highlighting associated et
 hical dilemmas. Research findings on therapist dis
 closure\, clinical examples\, and evidence-based g
 uidelines for its use will be presented.\n \n \n 
CATEGORIES:Conference
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
DTSTAMP;TZID=America/Chicago:20261003T090000
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20261003T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20261003T121500
LOCATION:Shepherd of the Hills Presbyterian Church\n 5226 W
  William Cannon Dr.\n Austin\, TX 78749\n United S
 tates\n 
URL:https://austinpsychoanalytic.org/civicrm/event/info/?reset=1&id=65
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
